yes, The Google Hardware is made and we’ve seen them come in the form of Pixelbooks, Pixel phones, or even Chromebooks, but the hardware isn’t central to the big earnings picture that Google is already painting. For Google, it is not a file Tools What’s important, it’s the user’s data and so its software does a good job even as other hardware companies do the hard work or manufacture and sell their Goggle-based products. They also take the risk of making products that you may or may not sell, but that’s something you don’t have to worry about.
What Google does in making hardware is test the waters with its software and perhaps even gently nudge manufacturers on the paths to take. Then Google sits back and collects the user data that flows through its software on other companies’ machines. phones For computers and more.
Providing an example is Android Central. Take, for example, what happened to the Pixelbook. Google simply canceled the line! Now, fans of the product were quite upset, but as far as Google was concerned, it all made perfect sense. After showing the capabilities of the product to other companies, Google and other manufacturers withdrew laptopstook over.
In this respect, it is similar to Google Microsoft instead of apple Just because he creates programs for others People to develop their products while the latter designs the products as well as designs the software for them.
Yes, Google and Microsoft also manufacture products as mentioned earlier, but the intent is quite different. Google makes products to test and improve its software as much as possible. With these products, Google experiments with “specialized hardware configurations”, such as Android Central He said, to improve her other business. That’s why Google has a long list of products to make including camerasAnd the WIFI routers and more.
The end result is always a desire to collect more and more user data even though it may be a loss money on these hardware products. And user data is where Google really makes its money.
“I think their ultimate goal may be user information obtained through use of the device rather than generating revenue through sales of the devices themselves,” said Sujeong Lim, Research Analyst at Counterpoint Research.
In fact, it’s a win-win situation for everyone, from companies to users themselves – as long as they don’t find their privacy abused.
This strategy is likely to be rolled out to the Pixel Watch as well. Once other smartwatch manufacturers pick up and work with similar products, Google will likely back down once the goal is achieved. And if the product fails, it simply stops making them.
One thing is clear, if Google can get everything it wants from other companies’ hardware, it probably won’t be in manufacturing at all. Since she can’t, she has to do it.
So, killing its hardware for Google is just an integral part of the business that aims to increase its profits.